Indistinguishable network dynamics can emerge from unalike plasticity rules
Ramesh, P.; Confavreux, B.; Goncalves, P. J.; Vogels, T. P.; Macke, J. H.
Show abstract
Synaptic plasticity is thought to be critical for building and maintaining brain circuits. Models of plasticity, or plasticity rules, are typically designed by hand, and evaluated based on their ability to elicit similar neuron or circuit properties to ground truth. While this approach has provided crucial insights into plasticity mechanisms, it is limited in its scope by human intuition and cannot identify all plasticity mechanisms that are consistent with the empirical data of interest. In other words, focusing on individual hand-crafted rules ignores the potential degeneracy of plasticity mechanisms that explain the same empirical data, and may thus lead to inaccurate experimental predictions. Here, we use an unsupervised, adversarial approach to infer plasticity rules directly from neural activity recordings. We show that even in a simple, idealised network model, many mechanistically different plasticity rules are equally compatible with empirical data. Our results suggest the need for a shift in the study of plasticity rules, considering as many degenerate plasticity mechanisms consistent with data as possible, before formulating experimental predictions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A solution to temporal credit assignment using cell-type-specific modulatory signals 97%
- Modeling and dissociation of intrinsic and input-driven neural population dynamics underlying behavior 96%
- Random noise promotes slow heterogeneous synaptic dynamics important for robust working memory computation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.