Machine learning predicts metastatic progression using novel differentially expressed lncRNAs as potential markers in pancreatic cancer
Alsharoh, H.
Show abstract
AbstractPancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with high mortality overall. Recent literature has focused on investigating long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in several cancers, but studies on their functions in PC are lacking. The purpose of this study was to identify novel lncRNAs and utilize machine learning to techniques to predict metastatic cases of PC using the identified lncRNAs. To identify significantly altered expression of lncRNA in PC, data was collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) transcriptomic profiles of pancreatic carcinomas were extracted for differential gene expression analysis. To assess the contribution of these lncRNAs to metastatic progression, different ML algorithms were used, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest classifier (RFC) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting Classifier (XGBC). To improve the predictive accuracy of these models, hyperparameter tuning was performed, in addition to reducing bias through the synthetic minority oversampling technique. Out of 60,660 gene transcripts shared between 151 PC patients, 38 lncRNAs that were significantly differentially expressed were identified. To further investigate the functions of the novel lncRNAs, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on the population lncRNA panel. GSEA results revealed enrichment of several terms implicated in proliferation. Moreover, using the 4 ML algorithms to predict metastatic progression returned 76% accuracy for both SVM and RFC, explicitly based on the novel lncRNA panel. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to identify this lncRNA panel to differentiate between non-metastatic PC and metastatic PC, with many novel lncRNAs previously unmapped to PC. The ML accuracy score reveals important involvement of the detected RNAs. Based on these findings, I suggest further investigations of this lncRNA panel in vitro and in vivo, as they could be targeted for improved outcomes in PC patients, as well as assist in the diagnosis of metastatic progression based on RNA-seq data of primary pancreatic tumors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems biomedicine of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer reveals potential therapeutic targets 96%
- Patient stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using the global transcription factor activity landscape derived from RNA-seq data 96%
- miR-100-5p downregulates mTOR to suppress the proliferation, migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discovering Key Transcriptomic Regulators in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma using Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Model 95%
- Immune Classification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma 95%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 96%
- Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics 95%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tissue micro-RNAs associated with colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review 96%
- MAP Kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin are main pathways of gallbladder carcinogenesis: Results from bioinformatic analysis of Next Generation Sequencing data from a hospital-based cohort. 95%
- A protocol for good quality genomic DNA isolation from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues without using commercial kits 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.