Back

Anticipatory smooth eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: role of target speed and acceleration

Carneiro Morita, V.; Souto, D.; Masson, G. S.; Montagnini, A.

2023-11-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.10.31.564614 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sensory-motor systems can extract statistical regularities in dynamic uncertain environments, enabling quicker responses and anticipatory behavior for expected events. Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements (aSP) have been observed in primates when the temporal and kinematic properties of a forthcoming visual moving target are fully or partially predictable. To investigate the nature of the internal model of target kinematics underlying aSP, we tested the effect of varying the target kinematics and its predictability. Participants tracked a small visual target in a constant direction with either constant, accelerating or decelerating speed. Across experimental blocks, we manipulated the probability of each kinematic condition varying either speed or acceleration across trials; with either one kinematic condition (providing certainty) or with a mixture of conditions with a fixed probability within a block. We show that aSP is robustly modulated by target kinematics. With constant-velocity targets, aSP velocity scales linearly with target velocity in blocked sessions, and matches the probability-weighted average in the mixture sessions. Predictable target acceleration does also have an influence on aSP, suggesting that the internal model of motion which drives anticipation contains some information about the changing target kinematics, beyond the initial target speed. However, there is a large variability across participants in the precision and consistency with which this information is taken into account in order to control anticipatory behavior.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.