Allele-specific digital PCR enhances precision and sensitivity in the detection and quantification of copy number alterations in heterogeneous DNA samples: an in silico and in vitro validation study
Nell, R. J.; Versluis, M.; Zoutman, W. H.; Luyten, G. P. M.; Jager, M. J.; van der Velden, P. A.
Show abstract
The analysis of genetic variation is of crucial importance in cancer care. Measuring copy number alterations, however, remains challenging in heterogenous DNA samples, such as (liquid) biopsies. Using digital PCR, these alterations are classically studied by comparing the abundances of the target of interest to a stable genomic reference. Alternatively, copy numbers may be quantified based on the allelic (im)balance of a heterozygous common single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). In this study, the accuracy, practicability, precision and sensitivity of both approaches are evaluated in silico using a newly introduced R library digitalPCRsimulations, and in vitro by analysing control samples and uveal melanoma specimens in duplex and multiplex experimental setups. Our analyses show that both methodologies are equally effective, as long as a stable reference is identified (classic approach) and the allelic imbalance is caused by the loss or gain/amplification of only one of both alleles (SNP-based approach). Though, heterogeneous copy number alterations can be measured with more precision and sensitivity using the SNP-based approach. In DNA from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples, the latter approach can also overcome technical artefacts causing inconsistencies between DNA amplicons. In conclusion, the limits of detecting copy number alterations in heterogeneous DNA can be improved using the SNP-based approach. Consequently, an increasing number of clinical samples may be successfully analysed, providing novel potential for the identification, prognostication and management of cancer.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of tools for copy-number variation detection in germline whole exome and whole genome sequencing data 92%
- Accurate Screening for Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Detection and Profiling of Circulating Tumor Cells 91%
- Canine oral melanoma genomic and transcriptomic study defines two molecular subgroups with different therapeutical targets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of genomic alterations in breast cancer with circulating tumour DNA sequencing 94%
- Optimised multiplex amplicon sequencing for mutation identification using the MinION nanopore sequencer 93%
- VarLOCK - sequencing independent, rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern for point-of-care testing, qPCR pipelines and national wastewater surveillance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the performance of Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing with respect to Illumina microarrays and short-read sequencing 93%
- Potential and Limitations of the MinION Nanopore array for miRNA-Enabled Early Cancer Detection 92%
- Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods with and without sample multiplexing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- RetroTest unravels LINE-1 retrotransposition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 93%
- Molecular diagnosis and prognosis of cancers of unknown-primary (CUPs): progress from a microRNA-based droplet digital PCR assay 92%
- CRISPR targeting of FOXL2 c.402C>G mutation reduces malignant phenotype in granulosa tumor cells and identifies anti-tumoral compounds 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.