Back

Accelerated design of Escherichia coli genomes with reduced size using a whole-cell model and machine learning surrogate

Gherman, I. M.; Rees-Garbutt, J. P.; Pang, W.; Abdallah, Z. S.; Gorochowski, T. E.; Grierson, C. S.; Marucci, L.

2023-11-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.30.564402 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whole-cell models (WCMs) are multi-scale computational models that aim to simulate the function of all genes and processes within a cell. This approach is promising for designing genomes tailored for specific tasks. However, a limitation of WCMs is their long runtime. Here, we show how machine learning (ML) surrogates can be used to address this limitation by training them on WCM data to accurately predict cell division. Our ML surrogate achieves a 95% reduction in computational time compared to the original WCM. We then show that the surrogate and a genome-design algorithm can generate an in silico reduced E. coli cell, where 40% of the genes included in the WCM were removed. The reduced genome is validated using the WCM and interpreted biologically using gene ontology analysis. This approach illustrates how the holistic understanding gained from a WCM can be leveraged for synthetic biology tasks while reducing its runtime.

Published in Cell Systems · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
28.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Microorganisms
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
● 51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Epidemics
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
24
Metabolic Engineering
○ 75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Microbial Cell Factories
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.