Back

A multi-ancestry genome-wide association study identifies novel candidate loci in the RARB gene associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Mack, J. A.; Burkholder, A.; Akhtari, F. S.; House, J. S.; Sovio, U.; Smith, G. C. S.; Schmitt, C. P.; Fargo, D. C.; Hall, J. E.; Motsinger-Reif, A. A.

2023-11-01 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2023.10.30.23297806 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGenetic factors related to pregnancy-related traits are understudied, especially among ancestrally diverse cohorts. This study assessed maternal contributions to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in multi-ancestry cohorts. MethodsWe performed a genome-wide association study of HDP using data from the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) cohort (USA) with validation in the UK Biobank (UKBB). We performed gene-level and gene-set analyses and tested the association of polygenic scores (PGS) for systolic blood pressure (SBP), preeclampsia (PE), and gestational hypertension (GH). ResultsWe identified two novel maternal genome-wide significant associations with HDP. The lead independent variants were rs114954125 on chromosome 2 (near LRP1B; OR (95% CI): 3.03 (2.05, 4.49); P=3.19 - 10-8) and rs61176331 on chromosome 3 (near RARB; OR (95% CI): 3.09 (2.11, 4.53); P=7.97x10-9). We validated rs61176331 in the UKBB (P=3.73 - 10-2). When aggregating SNPs by genes, RARB (P=1.36 - 10-3) and RN7SL283P (P=2.56 - 10-2) were associated with HDP. Inflammatory and immunological biological pathways were most strongly related to HDP-associated genes. While all blood pressure and HDP-related PGS were significantly associated with HDP in PEGS, the SBP PGS was a stronger predictor of HDP (area under the curve (AUC): 0.57; R2=0.7%) compared to the PE PGS (AUC: 0.53; R2=0.2%). ConclusionOur study is the first to identify and validate maternal genetic variants near RARB associated with HDP. The findings demonstrate the power of multi-ancestry studies for genetic discovery and highlight the relationship between immune response and HDP and the utility of PGS for risk prediction. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier for PEGS: NCT00341237

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.5%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%