Back
Conformational Dynamics and Ligand Binding of the Human Voltage-Gated Proton Channel
Sun, X.; Mo, X.; Ruan, Z.; Chen, W.
2023-10-27
biochemistry
10.1101/2023.10.27.564100
bioRxiv
Show abstract
Withdrawal StatementThe authors have withdrawn this manuscript because the backbone assignment needs recalibration. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
●Non-profit
◐University press
○Commercial
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
●
238 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.3%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural insights into ATP-sensitive potassium channel mechanics: a role of intrinsically disordered regions. 93%
- Structural, Thermodynamic, and Dynamic Descriptors for Differential Mechanism of HIF-2 Activity Modulators 92%
- multiSMD - a Python toolset for multidirectional Steered Molecular Dynamics 91%
3
Journal of Molecular Biology
○
232 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elucidating the activation mechanism of the proton-sensing GPR68 receptor 92%
- An intracellular pathway controlled by the N-terminus of the pump subunit inhibits the bacterial KdpFABC ion pump in high K+ conditions 92%
- Allosteric regulation of 3CL protease of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV observed in the crystal structure ensemble 91%
4
eLife
●
5828 papers in training set
Top 25%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct mechanisms of inhibition of Kv2 potassium channels by tetraethylammonium and RY785 93%
- {Omega}-Loop mutations control dynamics of the active site by modulating the hydrogen-bonding network in PDC-3 β-lactamase 91%
- Design of novel Cyanovirin-N variants by modulation of binding dynamics through distal mutations 91%
50% of probability mass above
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.