Activity in the reticulospinal tract scales with handgrip force in humans
Danielson, T. L.; Gould, L.; DeFreitas, J. M.; MacLennan, R. J.; Ekstrand, C.; Borowsky, R.; Farthing, J. P.; Andrushko, J. W.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe neural pathways that contribute to force production in humans are currently poorly understood, as the relative roles of the corticospinal tract and brainstem pathways, such as the reticulospinal tract (RST), vary substantially across species. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we aimed to measure activation in the pontine reticular nuclei during different submaximal handgrip contractions to determine the potential role of the RST in force modulation. MethodsThirteen neurologically intact participants (age: 28 {+/-} 6 years) performed unilateral handgrip contractions at 25%, 50%, 75% of maximum voluntary contraction during brain scans. We quantified the magnitude of RST activation from the contralateral and ipsilateral sides in addition to the contralateral primary motor cortex during each of the three contraction intensities. ResultsA repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of force (p = 0.012, {eta} p 2 = 0.307) for RST activation, independent of side (i.e., activation increased with force for both contralateral and ipsilateral nuclei). Further analyses of these data involved calculating the linear slope between the magnitude of activation and handgrip force for each ROI at the individual-level. One-sample t-tests on the slopes revealed significant group-level scaling for the RST bilaterally, but only the ipsilateral RST remained significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. ConclusionsHere, we show evidence of task dependent activation in the RST pontine nuclei that was positively related to handgrip force. These data build on a growing body of literature that highlights the RST as a functionally relevant motor pathway for force modulation in humans. New & NoteworthyIn this short report, we used a task-based fMRI paradigm to show that activity in the reticulospinal tract, but not the contralateral motor cortex, scales linearly with increasing force during a handgrip task. These findings directly support recently proposed hypotheses that the reticulospinal tract may play an important role in modulating force production in humans.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional segregation of cortical hand and speech areas by frequency detuning of an intrinsic motor rhythm. 94%
- Whole brain mapping of somatosensory responses in awake marmosets investigated with ultra-high field fMRI 93%
- Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved Inter-Subject Alignment of the Lumbosacral Cord for Group-Level In Vivo Gray and White Matter Assessments: A Scan-Rescan MRI Study at 3T 94%
- A registration strategy to characterize DTI-observed changes in skeletal muscle architecture due to passive shortening 94%
- A preliminary study to evaluate white matter structural correlates of delayed visuospatial memory and one-week motor skill retention in nondemented older adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective Exploratory Analysis of Task-Specific Effects on Brain Activity after Stroke 95%
- Altered neural recruitment despite dual task performance recovery in athletes with repeat concussion 94%
- Functional MRI of native and non-native speech production in sequential German-English bilinguals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for gas-free measurements of absolute oxygen metabolism during both baseline and activation states in the human brain 93%
- The anterior cingulate cortex is involved in intero-exteroceptive integration for spatial image transformation of the self-body. 93%
- Imagined movement modulates cardiac-cortico-cortical and cardiac-cortico-cerebellar oscillatory networks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.