Back

Biosynthesis- and Metabolomics-guided discovery of antimicrobial cyclopeptides against drug-resistant clinical isolates

Cheng, Z.; He, B.-B.; Lei, K.; Gao, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Liu, H.; Liu, R.; Zhang, H.; Wu, S.; Zhang, W.; Tang, X.; Li, Y.-X.

2023-10-26 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.10.26.563470 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance remains a significant global threat, contributing significantly to mortality rates worldwide. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) have emerged as a promising source of novel peptide antibiotics due to their diverse chemical structures. Here, we reported the discovery of new Avi(Me)Cys-containing cyclopeptide antibiotics through a synergistic approach that combines rule-based genome mining, automated metabolomic analysis, and heterologous expression. We first bioinformatically identified 1,172 RiPP biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) responsible for Avi(Me)Cys-containing cyclopeptides from a vast pool of over 50,000 bacterial genomes. Subsequently, we successfully established the connection between three newly identified BGCs and the synthesis of five new peptide antibiotics. Notably, massatide A displayed excellent activity against a spectrum of gram-positive pathogens, including drug-resistant clinical isolates like linezolid-resistant S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.25 g/mL. The remarkable performance of massatide A in an animal infection model, coupled with a low risk of resistance and favorable safety profile, positions it as a promising candidate for antibiotic development. Our study highlights the potential of Avi(Me)Cys-containing cyclopeptides in expanding the arsenal of antibiotics against multi-drug-resistant bacteria, offering promising drug leads in the ongoing battle against infectious diseases.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.