A Phase 2 random, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant G protein-based respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in healthy older adults
Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.; Cheng, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Huai, X.; Xia, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of disease in older adults. Vaccines against RSV infections and respiratory diseases are in large market demand. Although there are currently two licensed RSV-based pre-F antigen vaccines available for older adults, no G antigen-based RSV vaccine is authorized. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant G protein-based RSV vaccine in this population. MethodsA phase-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the BARS13 (rRSV G protein with CsA) when administered by an intramuscular (IM) injection to healthy participants 60 to 80 years old. A total of 125 eligible participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio (vaccine versus placebo) for Cohorts 1 and 2 and randomized in a 2:1 ratio for Cohort 3 to receive one of the three treatment regimens or placebo. ResultsThe average age was 65.3, and 50.4% (63/125) were men. Until the interim analysis (4 weeks following the last vaccination), no treatment-related SAE occurred. TEAEs did not increase with vaccination dosage or frequency. All adverse effects were mild or moderate, not severe or life-threatening. BARS13 vaccination increased IgG anti-RSV antibody levels in all cohorts, but higher doses and frequency boosted immune responses significantly. The high-dose thrice-administered recipients had serum-specific IgG antibody GMC of 881.0 IU/mL (95% CI: 794.5-1473.4) before the first dose (Week 0), 1116.3 IU/mL (95% CI:990.7-1772.5) 4 weeks after the first dose (Week 4), 1309.4IU/mL (95% CI: 1162.8-2041.5) 4 weeks after the second dose (Week 8), and1359.6 IU/mL (95% CI: 1197.9-2525.7) 4 weeks after the third dose (Week 12). For the low-dose twice-administered recipients, 84% responded at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 83.3% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). The high-dose twice-administered recipients had 95.5% response at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 72.2% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). At Week 4, 85.7% of high-dose thrice-administered recipients responded, 85.2% at Week 8, and 79.2% at Week 12. ConclusionsThe study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of BARS13 across different dose groups. Adverse reactions were not significantly different among participants receiving varying doses of BARS13. Levels of anti-G antibodies exhibited a dose- and frequency-dependent responses in the older population. The continuous upward trend in antibody concentration up to the interim analysis is promising for the effectiveness of BARS13.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 98%
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 98%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A First in Human Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a G Protein Based Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18-45 Years 99%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster of protein subunit vaccine MVC-COV1901 after two doses of adenoviral vector vaccine AZD1222 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of a heterologous booster with an RBD virus-like particle vaccine following two- or three-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 97%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine for COVID-19 after a primary regimen with BBIBP-CorV or BNT162b2 vaccines in Lima, Peru 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of Intradermal Administration of Fractional Dose CoronaVac ® , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 as Primary Series Vaccination 97%
- Safety and immunogenicity of GamEvac-Combi, a heterologous rVSV- and rAd5-vectored Ebola vaccine: a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial in the Republic of Guinea and Russia 96%
- Cellular and humoral immune response to a third dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine – a prospective observational study 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.