Back

A Phase 2 random, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant G protein-based respiratory syncytial virus vaccine in healthy older adults

Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.; Cheng, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Huai, X.; Xia, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, B.

2023-10-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.10.26.23297584 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important cause of disease in older adults. Vaccines against RSV infections and respiratory diseases are in large market demand. Although there are currently two licensed RSV-based pre-F antigen vaccines available for older adults, no G antigen-based RSV vaccine is authorized. This phase 2 study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant G protein-based RSV vaccine in this population. MethodsA phase-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the BARS13 (rRSV G protein with CsA) when administered by an intramuscular (IM) injection to healthy participants 60 to 80 years old. A total of 125 eligible participants were randomized in a 3:1 ratio (vaccine versus placebo) for Cohorts 1 and 2 and randomized in a 2:1 ratio for Cohort 3 to receive one of the three treatment regimens or placebo. ResultsThe average age was 65.3, and 50.4% (63/125) were men. Until the interim analysis (4 weeks following the last vaccination), no treatment-related SAE occurred. TEAEs did not increase with vaccination dosage or frequency. All adverse effects were mild or moderate, not severe or life-threatening. BARS13 vaccination increased IgG anti-RSV antibody levels in all cohorts, but higher doses and frequency boosted immune responses significantly. The high-dose thrice-administered recipients had serum-specific IgG antibody GMC of 881.0 IU/mL (95% CI: 794.5-1473.4) before the first dose (Week 0), 1116.3 IU/mL (95% CI:990.7-1772.5) 4 weeks after the first dose (Week 4), 1309.4IU/mL (95% CI: 1162.8-2041.5) 4 weeks after the second dose (Week 8), and1359.6 IU/mL (95% CI: 1197.9-2525.7) 4 weeks after the third dose (Week 12). For the low-dose twice-administered recipients, 84% responded at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 83.3% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). The high-dose twice-administered recipients had 95.5% response at 4 weeks after the first immunization (Week 4) and 72.2% at 4 weeks after the second (Week 8). At Week 4, 85.7% of high-dose thrice-administered recipients responded, 85.2% at Week 8, and 79.2% at Week 12. ConclusionsThe study demonstrates the safety and tolerability of BARS13 across different dose groups. Adverse reactions were not significantly different among participants receiving varying doses of BARS13. Levels of anti-G antibodies exhibited a dose- and frequency-dependent responses in the older population. The continuous upward trend in antibody concentration up to the interim analysis is promising for the effectiveness of BARS13.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.1%
3
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.4%
4
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%