Back

Replacement of tibialis cranialis tendon with polyester, silicone-coated artificial tendon preserves biomechanical function in rabbits

Easton, K. L.; Hatch, C.; Stephens, K.; Marler, D.; Fidelis, O. P.; Sun, X.; Bowers, K. M.; Billings, C.; Greenacre, C. B.; Anderson, D. E.; Crouch, D. L.

2023-10-29 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.25.563771 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial tendons may be an effective alternative to autologous and allogenic tendon grafts for repairing critically sized tendon defects. The goal of this study was to quantify the in vivo hindlimb biomechanics (ground contact pressure and sagittal-plane motion) during hopping gait of rabbits having a critically sized tendon defect of the tibialis cranialis and either with or without repair using an artificial tendon. In five rabbits, the tibialis cranialis tendon of the left hindlimb was surgically replaced with a polyester, silicone-coated artificial tendon (PET-SI); five operated control rabbits underwent complete surgical excision of the biological tibialis cranialis tendon in the left hindlimb with no replacement (TE). At 8 weeks post-surgery, peak vertical ground contact force in the left hindlimb was statistically significantly less compared to baseline for the TE group (p=0.0215). Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis showed that, compared to baseline, the knee was significantly more extended during stance at 2 weeks post-surgery and during the swing phase of stride at 2 and 8 weeks post-surgery for the TE group (p<0.05). Also, the ankle was significantly more plantarflexed during swing at 2 and 8 weeks postoperative for the TE group (p<0.05). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the SPM analysis among timepoints in the PET-SI group for the knee or ankle. These findings suggest that the artificial tibialis cranialis tendon effectively replaced the biomechanical function of the native tendon.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
2
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%