Back

Pulsed stimuli entrain p53 to synchronize single cells and modulate cell-fate determination

Venkatachalapathy, H.; Yang, Z.; Azarin, S. M.; Sarkar, C. A.; Batchelor, E.

2023-11-15 systems biology
10.1101/2023.10.24.563786 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Entrainment to an external stimulus enables a synchronized oscillatory response across a population of cells, increasing coherent responses by reducing cell-to-cell heterogeneity. It is unclear whether the property of entrainability extends to systems where responses are intrinsic to the individual cell, rather than dependent on coherence across a population of cells. Using a combination of mathematical modeling, time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, and single-cell tracking, we demonstrated that p53 oscillations triggered by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be entrained with a periodic damage stimulus, despite such synchrony not known to function in effective DNA damage responses. Surprisingly, p53 oscillations were experimentally entrained over a wider range of DSB frequencies than predicted by an established computational model for the system. We determined that recapitulating the increased range of entrainment frequencies required, non-intuitively, a less robust oscillator and wider steady-state valley on the energy landscape. Further, we show that p53 entrainment can lead to altered expression dynamics of downstream targets responsible for cell fate in a manner dependent on target mRNA stability. Overall, this study demonstrates that entrainment can occur in a biological oscillator despite the apparent lack of an evolutionary advantage conferred through synchronized responses and highlights the potential of externally entraining p53 dynamics to reduce cellular variability and synchronize cell-fate responses for therapeutic outcomes.

Published in Molecular Systems Biology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.