Back

Rewiring of cortical glucose metabolism fuels human brain cancer growth

Scott, A. J.; Mittal, A.; Meghdadi, B.; Palavalasa, S.; Achreja, A.; O'Brien, A.; Kothari, A. U.; Zhou, W.; Xu, J.; Lin, A.; Wilder-Romans, K.; Edwards, D. M.; Wu, Z.; Feng, J.; Andren, A. C.; Zhang, L.; Tarnal, V.; Redic, K. A.; Qi, N.; Fischer, J.; Yang, E.; Regan, M. S.; Stopko, S. A.; Baquer, G.; Lawrence, T. S.; Venneti, S.; Agar, N. Y. R.; Lyssiotis, C. A.; Al-Holou, W. N.; Nagrath, D.; Wahl, D. R.

2023-10-25 oncology
10.1101/2023.10.24.23297489 medRxiv
Show abstract

The brain avidly consumes glucose to fuel neurophysiology. Cancers of the brain, such as glioblastoma (GBM), lose aspects of normal biology and gain the ability to proliferate and invade healthy tissue. How brain cancers rewire glucose utilization to fuel these processes is poorly understood. Here we perform infusions of 13C-labeled glucose into patients and mice with brain cancer to define the metabolic fates of glucose-derived carbon in tumor and cortex. By combining these measurements with quantitative metabolic flux analysis, we find that human cortex funnels glucose-derived carbons towards physiologic processes including TCA cycle oxidation and neurotransmitter synthesis. In contrast, brain cancers downregulate these physiologic processes, scavenge alternative carbon sources from the environment, and instead use glucose-derived carbons to produce molecules needed for proliferation and invasion. Targeting this metabolic rewiring in mice through dietary modulation selectively alters GBM metabolism and slows tumor growth. SignificanceThis study is the first to directly measure biosynthetic flux in both glioma and cortical tissue in human brain cancer patients. Brain tumors rewire glucose carbon utilization away from oxidation and neurotransmitter production towards biosynthesis to fuel growth. Blocking these metabolic adaptations with dietary interventions slows brain cancer growth with minimal effects on cortical metabolism.

Published in Nature (predicted rank #12) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.