A Protocol Describing A Scoping Review to Characterise ICU Admission Criteria
Soares, J. R.; Andersen, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionEffectively identifying deteriorated patients is vital to the development and validation of automated systems designed to predict clinical deterioration. Existing outcome measures used for this purpose have significant limitations. Published criteria for admission to high acuity inpatient areas may represent markers of patient deterioration and could inform the development of alternate outcome measures. ObjectivesThis is a protocol for a scoping review which aims to characterise published criteria for admission of adult inpatients to high acuity inpatient areas including intensive care units. Data sourcesElectronic databases PubMed and ProQuest EBook Central will be searched to identify papers published from 1999 to date of search. Publications of interest are those which describe prescriptive criteria for admission of adult inpatients to a clinical area with a higher level of care than a general hospital ward. Charting methodsData will be extracted from each publication using a standardised data-charting form. Data synthesisAdmission criteria characteristics from included publications will be summarised and presented in text and summary table form.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards definitions of critical illness and critical care using concept analysis 94%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
- Risks for death after admission to pediatric intensive care (PICU) - a comparison with the general population 94%
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 92%
- Risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: development and validation of the 4C Mortality Score 90%
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 93%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.