Back

Nonspecific membrane bilayer perturbations by ivermectin underlie SARS-CoV-2 in vitro activity

Eastman, R. T.; Rusinova, R.; Herold, K. F.; Huang, X.-P.; Dranchak, P.; Voss, T. C.; Rana, S.; Shrimp, J. H.; White, A. D.; Hemmings, H. C.; Roth, B. L.; Inglese, J.; Andersen, O. S.; Dahlin, J. L.

2023-10-24 pharmacology and toxicology Community evaluation
10.1101/2023.10.23.563088 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Since it was proposed as a potential host-directed antiviral agent for SARS-CoV-2, the antiparasitic drug ivermectin has been investigated thoroughly in clinical trials, which have provided insufficient support for its clinical efficacy. To examine the potential for ivermectin to be repurposed as an antiviral agent, we therefore undertook a series of preclinical studies. Consistent with early reports, ivermectin decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral burden in in vitro models at low micromolar concentrations, five-to ten-fold higher than the reported toxic clinical concentration. At similar concentrations, ivermectin also decreased cell viability and increased biomarkers of cytotoxicity and apoptosis. Further mechanistic and profiling studies revealed that ivermectin nonspecifically perturbs membrane bilayers at the same concentrations where it decreases the SARS-CoV-2 viral burden, resulting in nonspecific modulation of membrane-based targets such as G-protein coupled receptors and ion channels. These results suggest that a primary molecular mechanism for the in vitro antiviral activity of ivermectin may be nonspecific membrane perturbation, indicating that ivermectin is unlikely to be translatable into a safe and effective antiviral agent. These results and experimental workflow provide a useful paradigm for performing preclinical studies on (pandemic-related) drug repurposing candidates. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=61 SRC="FIGDIR/small/563088v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a21f94org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c76751org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@500930org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8b6c05_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Graphical abstract C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
10
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Molecular Pharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
15
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
19
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
21
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
23
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%