Back

Dense Sampling of Taxa and Genomes Untangles the Phylogenetic Backbone of a Non-model Plant Lineage Rife with Deep Hybridization and Allopolyploidy

Xu, C.; Jin, Z.; Wang, H.; Xie, S.; Lin, X.; Hodel, R. G. J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, D.; Liu, B.; Liu, G.; Jin, S.; Zhao, L.; Wu, J.; Ren, C.; Hong, D.; Liu, B.

2023-10-23 plant biology
10.1101/2023.10.21.563444 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phylogenetic networks, rather than purely bifurcating trees, more accurately depict the intricate evolutionary dynamics of most lineages, especially those characterized by extensive hybridization and allopolyploidization events. However, the challenges of achieving complete taxon sampling, and limited financial resources for studying non-model plant lineages, have hindered comprehensive and robust estimation of phylogenetic backbones with guidance from networks. The bellflower tribe, Campanuleae, characterized by a reticulate evolutionary history, serves as an ideal model to investigate how to diagnose nested ancient reticulation events. Here, by integrating multiple genomic data sources and a range of phylogenetic inference methods, we produced a robust phylogenetic backbone for the tribe Campanuleae. Our investigation of reticulate evolution indicates that hybridization and allopolyploidization were instrumental in shaping the diversity of the bellflower tribe, particularly during the initial diversification of the subtribe Phytematinae. Additionally, we ascertained that conflicting topologies resulting from distinct genomic datasets and inference methodologies significantly impact downstream estimates of divergence dating, ancestral area construction, and diversification rates. This study offers a universally relevant framework for deciphering how to use network-based phylogenetic structures using various genomic sources and inference methods. [Campanulaceae, Campanuleae, Cytonuclear discordance, paralog, phylogenomics, reticulate evolution]

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
9.7%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
5
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
6
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
22
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
26
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
30
Molecular Plant
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%