Back

Mental maps without vision: Neural signatures of cognitive maps based on haptic input in the hippocampal formation

Ottink, L.; van den Berg, L.; Peters, I.; van der Geest, T.; Haak, K.; Doeller, C.; van Wezel, R.

2023-10-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.10.20.563338 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human hippocampus is the key region for forming cognitive maps of our environment. Such a map can support spatial navigation. It is unclear whether this area is similarly involved when an environment is explored with our haptic sense. In this study, we investigated the neural representation of distances on a tactile map in the hippocampal formation, in visually impaired and sighted persons. To this end, 47 participants (22 persons with a visual impairment, PVIs, and 25 sighted controls) performed a navigation task where they learned a tactile city-like map including five item locations. We combined magnetic resonance imaging with adaptation analysis to assess representation of distances between item locations in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Additionally, we assessed cognitive map formation on a behavioural level. We also looked at functional connectivity between navigation-related areas during a subsequent resting-state block. Our data reveal across all participants that the left entorhinal cortex represents distances between locations on a tactile map. Here, we provide the first evidence that maps in the hippocampal formation is preserved when an environment is presented in a non-visual modality. The results also suggest that both PVIs and sighted persons constructed accurate cognitive maps of the tactile environment on a behavioural level. However, early PVIs showed lower performance compared to late PVIs, suggesting an advantage of visual experience. Additionally, we reveal functional connectivity between areas that were involved in the navigation task during a subsequent resting-state block. This might suggest either visual imagination of stimuli during the preceding tasks, or cognitive processes related to our spatial navigation task, which possibly involve replay of stimulus-specific activity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.