Back

Determination of Optimal Nutrient Levels in Baru Seedlings (Dipterix alata Vog.) Using the Mathematical Chance Method

Kusano, D.; Larson, L.; Camacho, M. A.

2023-10-21 plant biology
10.1101/2023.10.20.563291 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This work aimed to determine the optimal ranges by the Mathematical Chance (ChM) method in baru seedlings. To determine optimal ranges by ChM, the nutritional information from an experiment conducted in a protected environment from October 13, 2011, to February 11, 2012, in Selviria-MS and for seedling production, used a nursery with 50% light reduction polypropylene mesh and 15 x 21.5 cm plastic bags, which have a capacity of 1.8 L, which were filled with different substrate combinations. The ranges found for macronutrients with the ChM method were, in g kg-1, from 19.06 to 28.14; 1.52 to 3.38; 17.9 to 24.0; 1.76 to 3.54; 0.74 to 1.50; 1.26 to 2.26 for N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S, respectively. The ranges found for micronutrients with the ChM method were, in mg kg 1, from 21.79 to 33.59; 1.0 to 21.40; 75 to 104.4; 14.0 to 82.8; 18.0 to 24.4 for B, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn, respectively.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 2%
40.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Agronomy
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Plants
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.7%
7
Crop Science
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
8
Plant Direct
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
Environmental and Experimental Botany
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
10
Plant Methods
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
11
Science of The Total Environment
○ 186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
BMC Plant Biology
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Planta
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Plant Stress
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Physiologia Plantarum
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Plant Science
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Plant and Soil
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Peer Community Journal
● 281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.