Back

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in a Large US population Over a Period of 12 Months

Karkanitsa, M.; Li, Y.; Valenti, S.; Spathies, J.; Kelly, S.; Yee, L.; Croker, J. A.; Wang, J.; Lucia Alfonso, A.; Faust, M.; Mehalko, J.; Drew, M.; Denson, J.-P.; Putman, Z.; Fathi, P.; Ngo, T. B.; Siripong, N.; Ann Baus, H.; Petersen, B.; Ford, E. W.; Sundaresan, V.; Sundaresan, V.; Josyula, A.; Han, A.; Giurgea, L. T.; Angela Rosas, L.; Bean, R.; Athota, R.; Czajkowski, L.; Klump-Thomas, C.; Cervantes-Medina, A.; Gouzoulis, M.; Reed, S.; Graubard, B.; Hall, M. D.; Kalish, H.; Esposito, D.; Kimberly, R. P.; Reis, S.; Sadtler, K.; Memoli, M. J.

2023-10-21 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.10.20.23297329 medRxiv
Show abstract

Due to a combination of asymptomatic or undiagnosed infections, the proportion of the United States population infected with SARS-CoV-2 was unclear from the beginning of the pandemic. We previously established a platform to screen for SARS-CoV-2 positivity across a representative proportion of the US population, from which we reported that almost 17 million Americans were estimated to have had undocumented infections in the Spring of 2020. Since then, vaccine rollout and prevalence of different SARS-CoV-2 variants have further altered seropositivity trends within the United States population. To explore the longitudinal impacts of the pandemic and vaccine responses on seropositivity, we re-enrolled participants from our baseline study in a 6- and 12-month follow-up study to develop a longitudinal antibody profile capable of representing seropositivity within the United States during a critical period just prior to and during the initiation of vaccine rollout. Initial measurements showed that, since July 2020, seropositivity elevated within this population from 4.8% at baseline to 36.2% and 89.3% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. We also evaluated nucleocapsid seropositivity and compared to spike seropositivity to identify trends in infection versus vaccination relative to baseline. These data serve as a window into a critical timeframe within the COVID-19 pandemic response and serve as a resource that could be used in subsequent respiratory illness outbreaks.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
7
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
17
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%