Different perspectives on Quality in clinical education of physical therapy students - protocol of a scoping review
Walter, M. M.; Rogan, S.; Schurz, A. P.; Zinzen, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical education (CE) plays a crucial role in physical therapy education, yet there is a notable absence of established quality characteristics for its implementation. ObjectivesThis scoping review aims to elucidate how various stakeholders define and describe the quality of CE in higher education for physical therapy students. Additionally, it seeks to identify commonalities and distinctions in the application of the term "quality" in the context of CE. MethodsPeer-reviewed studies encompassing physical therapy students, clinical instructors, lecturers in physical therapy education, physical therapy educational sites, and supervising physical therapists in internships across all clinical fields will be included in the review. A comprehensive search strategy will be employed, utilizing multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ERIC, Education Research Complete, Education Database, and CINAHL. Eligibility screening will be independently conducted by two reviewers. Data extraction will be presented in a tabular or graphical format, aligning with the reviews objectives. DiscussionInsights gleaned from this study hold the potential to inform targeted interventions and improvements in CE, ultimately enhancing the learning outcomes and satisfaction of physical therapy students. This endeavor seeks to bridge the existing gap in defining and achieving quality in clinical education within the realm of physical therapy higher education.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 96%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 96%
- Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 93%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 93%
- Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews 93%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Tai Ji and/or Qigong on Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease A protocol for meta-analysis and systematic review 93%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 92%
- Open Science Practices Among Authors Published in Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.