Back

Triggers for Freezing of Gait in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Conde, C. I.; Lang, C.; Baumann, C. R.; Easthope, C. A.; Taylor, W. R.; Ravi, D. K.

2023-10-20 neurology
10.1101/2023.10.20.23297301 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFreezing of Gait (FOG) is a motor symptom frequently observed in advanced Parkinsons disease. However, due to its paroxysmal nature and diverse presentation, assessing FOG in a clinical setting can be challenging. Before FOG can be fully investigated, it is critical that a reliable experimental setting is established in which FOG can be evoked in a standardised manner, but the efficacy of various gait tasks and triggers for eliciting FOG remains unclear. ObjectivesThis study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the existing literature and evaluate the available evidence for the relationship between specific motor tasks, triggers, and FOG episodes in individuals with Parkinsons disease (PwPD). MethodsWe conducted a literature search on four online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) using the keywords "Parkinsons disease," "Freezing of Gait," and "triggers." A total of 128 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. ResultsThe review found that a wide range of gait tasks were employed in gait assessment studies on PD patients. However, three tasks (turning, dual tasking, and straight walking) were the most frequently used. Turning (28%) appears to be the most effective trigger for eliciting FOG in PwPD, followed by walking through a doorway (14%) and dual tasking (10%). ConclusionsThis review thereby supports the use of turning especially 360 degrees as a reliable trigger for FOG in PwPD. This could be beneficial to clinicians during clinical evaluations and researchers who wish to assess FOG in a laboratory environment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.