Back

Developmentally dynamic changes in DNA methylation in the human pancreas

MacCalman, A.; De Franco, E.; Franklin, A.; Flaxman, C. S.; Richardson, S. J.; Murrall, K.; Barts Pancreas Tissue Bank, ; Burrage, J.; Walker, E.; Morgan, N. G.; Hattersley, A.; Dempster, E. L.; Hannon, E.; Jeffries, A. R.; Owens, N. D. L.; Mill, J.

2023-12-31 genomics
10.1101/2023.10.19.563104 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Development of the human pancreas requires the precise temporal control of gene expression via epigenetic mechanisms and the binding of key transcription factors. We quantified genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation in human fetal pancreatic samples from donors aged 6 to 21 post-conception weeks. We found dramatic changes in DNA methylation across pancreas development, with >21% of sites characterized as developmental differentially methylated positions (dDMPs) including many annotated to genes associated with monogenic diabetes. An analysis of DNA methylation in postnatal pancreas tissue showed that the dramatic temporal changes in DNA methylation occurring in the developing pancreas are largely limited to the prenatal period. Significant differences in DNA methylation were observed between males and females at a number of autosomal sites, with a small proportion of sites showing sex-specific DNA methylation trajectories across pancreas development. Pancreas dDMPs were not distributed equally across the genome, and were depleted in regulatory domains characterized by open chromatin and the binding of known pancreatic development transcription factors. Finally, we compared our pancreas dDMPs to previous findings from the human brain, identifying evidence for tissue-specific developmental changes in DNA methylation. To our knowledge, this represents the most extensive exploration of DNA methylation patterns during human fetal pancreas development, confirming the prenatal period as a time of major epigenomic plasticity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.