Back

Isoniazid preventive therapy during infancy does not adversely effect growth among HIV-exposed uninfected children: secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial

Cherkos, A. S.; LaCourse, S. M.; Enquobahrie, D. A.; Escudero, J. N.; Mecha, J.; Matemo, D.; Kinuthia, J.; John-Stewart, G.

2023-10-20 hiv aids
10.1101/2023.10.19.23297259 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIsoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) decreases risk of tuberculosis (TB) disease; impact on long-term infant growth is unknown. In a recent randomized trial (RCT), we assessed IPT effects on infant growth without known TB exposure. MethodsThe infant TB Infection Prevention Study (iTIPS) trial was a non-blinded RCT among HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants in Kenya. Inclusion criteria included age 6-10 weeks, birthweight [≥]2.5 kg, and gestation [≥]37 weeks. Infants in the IPT arm received 10 mg/kg isoniazid daily for 12 months, while the control trial received no intervention; post-trial observational follow-up continued through 24 months of age. We used intent-to-treat linear mixed-effects models to compare growth rates (weight-for-age z-score [WAZ] and height-for-age z-score [HAZ]) between trial arms. ResultsAmong 298 infants, 150 were randomized to IPT, 47.6% were females, median birthweight was 3.4 kg (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-3.7), and 98.3% were breastfed. During the 12-month intervention period and 12-month post-RCT follow-up, WAZ and HAZ declined significantly in all children, with more HAZ decline in male infants. There were no growth differences between trial arms, including in sex-stratified analyses. In longitudinal linear analysis, mean WAZ ({beta}=0.04 [95% CI:-0.14, 0.22]), HAZ ({beta}=0.14 [95% CI:-0.06, 0.34]), and WHZ [{beta}=-0.07 [95% CI:-0.26, 0.11]) z-scores were similar between arms as were WAZ and HAZ growth trajectories. Infants randomized to IPT had higher monthly WHZ increase ({beta} to 24 months 0.02 [95% CI:0.01, 0.04]) than the no-IPT arm. ConclusionIPT administered to HEU infants did not significantly impact growth outcomes in the first two years of life.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.