Back

Multivariate Age-related analysis of variance in quantitative MRI maps: Widespread age-related differences revisited

Moallemian, S.; Bastin, C.; Callaghan, M. F.; Phillips, C.

2023-10-20 neurology
10.1101/2023.10.19.23297253 medRxiv
Show abstract

This study applied multivariate ANOVA to investigate age-related microstructural changes in the brain tissues driven primarily by myelin, iron, and water content, as observed in MRI (semi-)quantitative R1, R2*, MTsat and PD maps. This is effectively a re-analysis of the data analyzed in a univariate way by Callaghan et al., 2014. Voxel-wise analyses were performed on gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), in addition to region of interest (ROI) analyses. The multivariate approach identified brain regions showing coordinated alterations in multiple tissue properties and demonstrated bidirectional correlations between age and all examined modalities in various brain regions, including the caudate nucleus, putamen, insula, cerebellum, lingual gyri, hippocampus, and olfactory bulb. The multivariate model was more sensitive than univariate analyses, as evidenced by detecting a larger number of significant voxels within clusters in the supplementary motor area, frontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, occipital cortex, and cerebellum bilaterally. The examination of normalized, smoothed, and z-transformed maps within the ROIs revealed concurrent age-dependent alterations in myelin, iron, and water content. These findings contribute to our understanding of age-related brain differences and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of aging. The study emphasizes the importance of multivariate analysis for detecting subtle microstructural changes associated with aging when dealing with multiple quantitative MRI parameter maps.

Published in Frontiers in Neuroscience (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.