An Assessment of Patients Satisfaction with Eye Care Services Receiving from Eye Hospitals in Madhesh Province, Nepal
Shah, R.; Mishra, S. K.; Sharma, P.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study was conducted to assess the level of patient satisfaction with the eye care services received from different tertiary eye hospitals, running under Nepal Nepal Netra Jyoti (NNJS) Sangh, of Madhesh Province, Nepal over a 3-month period (October-December) 2017. MethodsA Cross-sectional based study with client exit interviews were done, using pretested Likert scale tool in sample of 1190 (P=0.5, and 95% CI) consenting patients after receiving the ophthalmic care enrolled in the mentioned tertiary eye hospitals of Madhesh Province. Data on Behavior of the service provider, Services and facilities provided by the hospital was analyzed with the level of patients satisfaction. A Pearsons chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between overall satisfaction and the dependent variables. ResultsOnly 3.8 % of patients reported visiting the hospital more than four times. The main reasons for choosing their respective hospital was the quality of services delivered through modern equipment at affordable costs (53 %) followed by easy access to hospital (39%). The average waiting time was 58 min, with a range of 5-240 min. Level of education (P<0.05), Socioeconomic status (P<0.05), Waiting time (P<0.05), Hospital operating hours (P<0.05), Cleanliness (P<0.05) and Cost of Service (P<0.05) were significantly associated with the overall satisfaction with the services. Behavior of the service providers did not play a statistically significant role in overall satisfaction. ConclusionPatient satisfaction is a highly desirable outcome of clinical care and may even be an element of health status itself. Our data showed that a significant proportion (95%) of patients were satisfied, or highly satisfied overall (across all parametric measures), and that personal experience, beliefs and background may play a confounding factor in satisfaction. As a result, it can be safely concluded that perceived quality and performance in the hospitals are exceptional.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional survey of burnout in a sample of resident physicians in Sudan 96%
- Health-related quality of life of adult COVID-19 patients following one-month illness experience since diagnosis: findings of a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh 96%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 97%
- Comparative study between first and second wave of COVID-19 deaths in India - a single center study 95%
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 96%
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 95%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.