Opportunities to Address Specialty Care Deserts and the Digital Divide: VA's Virtual Hub-and-Spoke Cardiology Clinic
Tisdale, R. L.; Purmal, C.; Kalwani, N. M.; Sandhu, A. T.; Heidenreich, P.; Zulman, D. M.; Hussain, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccess to specialty care, including cardiology, in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) varies widely across geographic regions. VHAs clinical resource hub (CRH) model of care offers mostly-virtual specialty care to individuals in low access regions and has recently been implemented in cardiology. How implementation of this predominantly virtual cardiology program affects the reach of cardiology specialty care in VHA is not known. This study describes the association between patient characteristics and use of CRH cardiology care in VHAs Sierra Pacific region (Northern California, Nevada, and the Pacific Islands). MethodsWe compared patients who used CRH cardiology services between 7/15/2021 and 3/31/2023 to non-CRH Sierra Pacific cardiology patients, then used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between patient-level factors and odds of being a CRH user. ResultsThere were 804 CRH users over the study period with 1,961 CRH encounters, and 19,583 non-CRH users with 83,489 encounters. Among CRH users, 8% were women and 41% were [≥]75 years, compared to 5% and 49% respectively among non-CRH users. Similar proportions in both groups were rural (26% for both CRH and non-CRH), highly-disabled (48% CRH, 47% non-CRH), and low-income (21% CRH, 20% non-CRH). In multivariate logistic models, adjusted odds of using CRH were higher for women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.70 [95% CI 1.46-1.98]) and lower for older Veterans (AOR 0.33 for [≥]75 [95% CI 0.23-0.48]). Highly rural Veterans also had higher adjusted odds of using CRH (AOR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30-2.69]). ConclusionsThe Sierra Pacific CRH cardiology program served a disproportionately high number of women and highly rural Veterans and similar proportions of highly-disabled and low-income Veterans as conventional VA care in its first two years of operation. This predominately-virtual model of cardiology care may be an effective strategy for overcoming access barriers for certain individuals, though targeted efforts may be required to reach older Veterans.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 94%
- Myocardial Infarction across COVID-19 Pandemic Phases: Insights from the Veterans Health Affairs System 93%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 94%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 93%
- Barriers and Facilitators to Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in an Integrated Health System and Federally-Qualified Health Centers: A Thematic Qualitative Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Mortality and Aspirin Prescription for COVID-19 Patients at the Veterans Health Administration 93%
- Unplanned Hospital Visits after Ambulatory Surgical Care 93%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 93%
- Hospitalist perspectives of available tests to monitor volume status in patients with heart failure: a qualitative study 91%
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality and clinical outcomes among patients greater than and less than 80 years undergoing TAVR 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.