Back

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Data Science for Integration of Social Determinants of Health in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review

Abbott, E.; Apakama, D.; Richardson, L.; Chan, L.; Carr, B.; Nadkarni, G.

2023-10-18 emergency medicine
10.1101/2023.10.17.23297158 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveSocial Determinants of Health (SDOH) are critical drivers of health disparities and patient outcomes. However, accessing and collecting patient level SDOH data can be operationally challenging in the emergency department clinical setting requiring innovative approaches. This scoping review examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and data science for modeling, extraction, and incorporation of SDOH data specifically within emergency departments (ED), further identifying areas for advancement and investigation. MethodsWe conducted a standardized search across Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, Web of Science, and ERIC databases for studies published between 2015-2022. We focused on identifying studies employing AI or data science related to SDOH within emergency care contexts or conditions. Two specialized reviewers in Emergency Medicine and clinical informatics independently assessed each article, resolving discrepancies through iterative reviews and discussion. We then extracted data covering study details, methodologies, patient demographics, care settings, and principal outcomes. ResultsOf the 1,047 studies screened, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Notably, 9 out of 26 studies were solely concentrated on ED patients. Conditions studied spanned broad Emergency Medicine complaints and conditions including sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and asthma. The majority (n=16) explored multiple SDOH domains, with homelessness/housing insecurity and neighborhood/built environment predominating. Machine learning (ML) techniques were utilized in 23 of the studies, natural language processing (NLP) being the most common approach used (n=11). Rule-based (n=5), deep learning (n=2), and pattern matching (n=4) were the most common NLP techniques used. NLP models in the reviewed studies displayed significant predictive performance with outcomes, With F1-scores ranging between 0.40 - 0.75 and specificities nearing 95.9%. ConclusionAlthough in its infancy, the convergence of AI and data science techniques, especially ML and NLP, with SDOH in Emergency Medicine offers transformative possibilities for better usage and integration of social data into clinical care and research. With a significant focus on the ED and notable NLP model performance, there is an imperative to standardize SDOH data collection, refine algorithms for diverse patient groups, and champion interdisciplinary synergies. These efforts aim to harness SDOH data optimally, enhancing patient care and mitigating health disparities. Our research underscores the vital need for continued investigation in this domain.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.4%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
8
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
11
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%