Large Individual Differences in Functional Connectivity in the Context of Major Depression and Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy
van der Wijk, G.; Zamyadi, M.; Bray, S.; Hassel, S.; Arnott, S. R.; Frey, B. N.; Kennedy, S. H.; Davis, A. D.; Hall, G. B.; Lam, R. W.; Milev, R.; Muller, D. J.; Parikh, S. V.; Soares, C.; MacQueen, G. M.; Strother, S. S.; Protzner, A. B.
Show abstract
Clinical studies of major depression (MD) often examine differences between groups whilst ignoring within-group variation. However, inter-individual differences in brain function are increasingly recognised as important and may impact effect sizes related to group effects. Here, we examine the magnitude of individual differences in relation to group differences that are commonly investigated (e.g., related to MD diagnosis and treatment response). Functional MRI data from 107 participants (63 female, 44 male) were collected at baseline, 2 and 8 weeks during which patients received pharmacotherapy (escitalopram, N=68), and controls (N=39) received no intervention. The unique contributions of different sources of variation were examined by calculating how much variance in functional connectivity was shared across all participants and sessions, within/across groups (patients vs controls, responders vs non-responders, female vs male participants), recording sessions and individuals. Individual differences and common connectivity across groups, sessions and participants contributed most to the explained variance (>95% across analyses). Group differences related to MD diagnosis, treatment response and biological sex made significant but small contributions (0.3-1.2%). High individual variation was present in multimodal association areas, while low individual variation characterized primary sensorimotor regions. Group differences were much smaller than individual differences in the context of MD and its treatment. These results could be linked to the variable findings and difficulty translating research on MD to clinical practice. Future research should examine brain features with low and high individual variation in relation to psychiatric symptoms and treatment trajectories to explore the clinical relevance of the individual differences identified here. Significance statementStudies on major depression often investigate differences in brain function between groups (e.g., those with/without a diagnosis) with the aim of better understanding this prevalent condition. Our study shows that group differences only tell part of the story, by highlighting strong common and individually unique features of brain network organization, relative to surprisingly subtle features of diagnosis and treatment success. From the overall explained variation in brain connectivity, about 50% was shared across everyone, while another 45% was unique to individuals. Only [~]5% could be attributed to diagnosis, treatment success and biological sex differences. Our results suggest that examining individual differences, and their potential clinical relevance, alongside group differences may bring us closer to improving clinical outcomes for major depression. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01655706.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tensorial Independent Component Analysis Reveals Social and Reward Networks Associated with Major Depressive Disorder 98%
- Multimodal fusion of structural and functional brain imaging in depression using linked independent component analysis 98%
- The Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Ego Dissolution and Emotional Arousal During the Psychedelic State 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Serotonergic psychedelic drugs LSD and psilocybin reduce the hierarchical differentiation of unimodal and transmodal cortex 97%
- The longitudinal stability of fMRI activation during reward processing in adolescents and young adults 96%
- Psilocybin induces spatially constrained alterations in thalamic functional organization and connectivity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait but not state- depression. 97%
- Graded changes in local functional connectivity of the brain in young people with depression 96%
- Brain Functional Connectivity and Anatomical Features as Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome for Anxiety in Youths 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.