Structural covariation between cerebellum and cerebral cortex is atypically modulated by thalamus in autism spectrum disorder
Uquillas, F. d.; Sefik, E.; Li, B.; Trotter, M.; Steele, K.; Seidlitz, J.; Gesue, R.; Latif, M.; Fasulo, T.; Zhang, V.; Kislin, M.; Verpeut, J.; Cohen, J.; Sepulcre, J.; Wang, S. S.- H.; Gomez, J.
Show abstract
Despite its strong interconnectivity with the cerebral cortex, the influence of the human cerebellum on neocortical structure and its role in the development of neuropsychiatric disorders is unclear. Because cerebellar damage in early postnatal life creates a high risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we investigated inter-relationships in cerebello-cerebral morphology. Leveraging a large structural brain MRI dataset in neurotypical children (n=375) and those diagnosed with ASD (n=373), we examined whether volumetric variation in cerebellar structure across individuals was correlated with neocortical variation during development, modeling the thalamus as a moderating coupling factor. We found negative covariation between cerebellar cortical regions and thalamic/sensorimotor neocortical regions, and positive covariation between thalamic and sensorimotor neocortical regions. This pattern aligned with the major disynaptic path of cerebellar inhibition to thalamocortical excitation. Examining the dependence of this structural covariation on ASD diagnosis, we found that neurotypical and ASD children displayed inverted hemispheric biases. In ASD, the thalamus moderated structural associations between the left cerebellum and right sensorimotor cortex. For neurotypical children, right cerebellum and left sensorimotor cortex were coupled. Notably, structural coupling between cerebellum, thalamus, and neocortex was strongest in younger childhood and waned by early adolescence, a time during which behavioral differences were smallest between typically developing and autistic children. In addition to the sensorimotor cortex, cerebellar dentate nuclei in ASD displayed greater coupling to broad neocortical regions, and these nuclei related to cognitive function differently such that greater dentate nuclear volume was associated with greater behavioral impairment in ASD but not in controls. Graph analyses demonstrated that the cerebello-thalamocortical network was more densely and less prolifically interconnected in ASD than in typical development. Taken as a whole, our study reveals a developmental interplay between the cerebellum, thalamus, and neocortex which differs in ASD from neurotypical children. This pattern is consistent with a model of ASD in which early developmental influences of cerebellar output on brain maturation are specifically moderated by cerebello-thalamocortical pathways.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsic excitation-inhibition imbalance affects medial prefrontal cortex differently in autistic men versus women 94%
- Atypical cognitive training-induced learning and brain plasticity and their relation to insistence on sameness in children with autism 94%
- Diffusion-MRI-based regional cortical microstructure at birth for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2-year-olds 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of structural brain asymmetries in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in 39 datasets 95%
- Autism spectrum disorders and brain volume link through a set of mTOR-related genes 94%
- Transdiagnostic Profiles of Behaviour and Communication Relate to Academic and Socio-emotional Functioning and Neural White Matter Organisation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconciling Dimensional and Categorical Models of Autism Heterogeneity: a Brain Connectomics & Behavioral Study 96%
- Connectome-wide mega-analysis reveals robust patterns of atypical functional connectivity in autism 96%
- Autism excitation-inhibition imbalance linked to brain hyperconnectivity: An analysis based on 657 autistic subjects 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.