Back

Evaluating flash freezing for preservation of rat abdominal aorta for delayed biomechanical characterization

van der Laan, K. W. F.; Reesink, K.; Lambrichts, S.; Bitsch, N. J. J. E.; van der Taelen, L.; Foulquier, S.; Delhaas, T.; Spronck, B.; Giudici, A.

2023-10-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.16.562465 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Most studies investigating arterial stiffening use animal rather than human arteries. This is because human tissue becomes available in small amounts and at irregular times, which complicates planning of experimental work. Suitable tissue preservation methods for delayed biomechanical testing prevents the need for testing fresh tissue and alleviates some of the logistical challenges of human ex vivo studies. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether the existing method of flash freezing and subsequent cryostorage provides is suitable for delaying the characterization of arterial biomechanics. Fresh and flash frozen abdominal aortas (n=16 and 14, respectively) were quasi- statically and dynamically tested using a biaxial testing set-up with dynamic pressurization capabilities. The acquired biomechanical data was modeled using a constituent-based quasi-linear viscoelastic modeling framework, deriving directional stiffness parameters, individual constituent biomechanical contributions, and viscoelastic stiffening under dynamic pressurization conditions. Flash freezing reduced arterial wall thickness, increased circumferential stiffness, as well as reduced viscoelastic stiffening at higher pressures. These findings reflected those in the modeled contribution of collagen to arterial biomechanics, showing increased collagen load bearing at higher pressures. However, despite the above mentioned detectable changes, flash freezing did not alter the mechanical relation between elastin and collagen, maintaining a non-linear response to pressurization and stretch. Flash freezing may thus be suitable for studies requiring delayed characterization of passive arterial biomechanics, assuming care is taken to ascert that the impact of flash freezing on study groups can be approached as a systematic error.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.1%
3
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
6
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%