Back

Antiviral capacity of the early CD8 T-cell response is predictive of natural control of SIV infection

Vemparala, B.; Madelain, V.; Passaes, C.; Millet, A.; Avettand-Fenoel, V.; Djidjou-Demasse, R.; Dereuddre-Bosquet, N.; Le Grand, R.; Rouzioux, C.; Vaslin, B.; Saez-Cirion, A.; Guedj, J.; Dixit, N. M.

2023-10-14 microbiology
10.1101/2023.10.13.562306 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While most individuals suffer progressive disease following HIV infection, a small fraction spontaneously controls the infection. Although CD8 T-cells have been implicated in this natural control, their mechanistic roles are yet to be established. Here, we combined mathematical modeling and analysis of data from 16 SIV-infected macaques, of which 12 were natural controllers, to elucidate the role of CD8 T-cells in natural control. For each macaque, we considered, in addition to the canonical in vivo plasma viral load and SIV DNA data, longitudinal ex vivo measurements of the virus suppressive capacity of CD8 T-cells. Available mathematical models do not allow analysis of such combined in vivo-ex vivo datasets. By explicitly modeling the ex vivo assay and integrating it with in vivo dynamics, we developed a new framework that enabled the analysis. Our model fit the data well and estimated that the recruitment rate and/or maximal killing rate of CD8 T-cells was up to 2-fold higher in controllers than non-controllers (p=0.013). Importantly, the cumulative suppressive capacity of CD8 T-cells over the first 4-6 weeks of infection was associated with virus control (Spearmans {rho}=- 0.51; p=0.05). Thus, our analysis identified the early cumulative suppressive capacity of CD8 T-cells as a predictor of natural control. Furthermore, simulating a large virtual population, our model quantified the minimum capacity of this early CD8 T-cell response necessary for long-term control. Our study presents new, quantitative insights into the role of CD8 T-cells in the natural control of HIV infection and has implications for remission strategies.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.