Back

Evaluating the patterning cascade model of tooth morphogenesis in the human lower mixed and permanent dentition

Kenessey, D. E.; Stojanowski, C. M.; Paul, K. S.

2023-10-17 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.10.13.562267 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe patterning cascade model of crown morphogenesis has been studied extensively in a variety of organisms to elucidate the evolutionary history surrounding postcanine tooth form. The current research examines the degree to which model expectations are reflected in the crown configuration of lower deciduous and permanent molars in a modern human sample. This study has two main goals: 1) to determine if metameric and antimeric pairs significantly differ in size, accessory trait expression, and relative intercusp spacing, and 2) to establish if the relative distance among early-forming cusps accounts for observed variation in accessory cusp expression. MethodsTooth size, intercusp distance, and morphological trait expression data were collected from 3D scans of mandibular dental casts representing 124 individual participants of the Harvard Solomon Islands Project. Paired tests were utilized to compare tooth size, accessory trait expression, and relative intercusp distance between diphyodont metameres and permanent antimeres. Proportional odds logistic regression was implemented to investigate how the likelihood of accessory cusp formation varies as a function of the distance between early-developing cusps. Results/SignificanceFor paired molars, results indicated significant discrepancies in tooth size and cusp 5 expression, but not cusp 6 and cusp 7 expression. Several relative intercusp distances emerged as important predictors of accessory cusp expression. These findings support previous quantitative genetic results and suggest the development of neighboring crown structures represents a zero-sum partitioning of cellular territory and resources. As such, this study contributes to a better understanding of the evolution of deciduous and permanent molar crown configuration in humans.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
13
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%