The effects of genome size on cell size and the functional composition and morphology of leaves: a case study in Rhododendron (Ericaceae)
Dastpak, A.; Williams, M.; Perkins, S.; Perkins, J.; Horn, C.; Thompson, P.; Ryan, C.; Medeiros, J.; An, Y.-D.; Jiang, G.-F.; Simonin, K.; Roddy, A.
Show abstract
Background and AimsDespite the predominance of scaling photosynthetic metabolism by two-dimensional leaf surface area, leaves are three-dimensional structures composed of multiple tissues that directly and indirectly influence photosynthetic metabolism. The structure of leaf surfaces for CO2 diffusion and light transmission and the internal volume of tissues that process energy and matter work together to control rates of resource acquisition and turnover. Here we investigate the influence of cell size and packing density on resource acquisition as measured by surface conductance to CO2 and water vapor and on resource turnover as measured by leaf water turnover time. MethodsWe sampled wild and cultivated congeneric species in the genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae) and measured genome size, anatomical traits related to cell sizes and packing densities, and morphological traits related to water content and dry mass allocation. ResultsAmong Rhododendron, anatomical traits related to cell size and morphological traits related to water content and dry mass investment varied largely orthogonally to each other, allowing for many combinations of leaf traits to exist. However, there was a strong, negative relationship between the leaf water residence time ({tau}) and the maximum leaf surface conductance per leaf volume (gmax,vol), both of which are influenced by cell size and cell packing densities. ConclusionsDespite leaf function being controlled by many potential combinations of leaf cell- and tissue-level traits, cell size has a pervasive effect on leaf function. Small cells allow for higher diffusion of CO2 and water vapor per unit leaf volume (gmax,vol) even at constant leaf thickness, but small cells also result in shorter leaf water residence times ({tau}). The strong tradeoff between gmax,vol and ({tau}) illuminates how genome size-cell size allometry influences the fast-slow continuum of plant carbon and water economy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The shared genetic basis of leaf morphology and tensile resistance underlies the effect of growing season length in a widespread perennial grass 97%
- Quantitative trait locus mapping reveals an independent genetic basis for joint divergence in leaf function, life-history, and floral traits between scarlet monkeyflower (Mimulus cardinalis) populations 96%
- Increases in vein length compensate for leaf area lost to lobing in grapevine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Xylem Anatomical Adaptations Associated with Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and Hydraulic Capacitance in Clusia Leaves: Lessons for CAM Bioengineering 97%
- Leaf anatomy is not correlated to CAM function in a C3+CAM hybrid species, Yucca gloriosa 96%
- Evolution of drought resistance strategies following the introduction of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive stomatal closure under extreme drought in an angiosperm species 96%
- Intrinsic water use efficiency depends on stomatal aperture rather than stomatal density in C3 and C4 grasses grown at glacial CO2 and low light 95%
- Nitrogen demand, supply, and acquisition strategy control plant responses to elevated CO2 at different scales 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissecting Succulence: Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and Hydraulic Capacitance are Independent Adaptations in Clusia Leaves 97%
- Anatomical drivers of stomatal conductance in sorghum lines with different leaf widths grown under different temperatures 96%
- Sieve tube structural variation in Austrobaileya scandens and its significance for lianescence 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.