Back

Fibril Paint to detect Amyloids and determine Fibril Length

Aragones Pedrola, J.; Dekker, F. A.; Garfagnini, T.; Mayer, G.; Koopman, M. B.; Bergmeijer, M.; Forster, F.; Hoozemans, J. J.; Jensen, H.; Friedler, A.; Rudiger, S. G.

2023-11-15 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.10.13.562220 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tau aggregation into amyloid fibrils is linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimers Disease. The molecular processes underlying aggregation in disease are poorly understood. Here, we introduce FibrilPaint1 as a tool to measure the size of Tau amyloid fibrils in fluids, from early aggregation stages to mature fibrils. FibrilPaint1 is a 22mer peptide with many exciting properties, which makes it a tool for diagnostics and an attractive start point for developing a class of effective fibril targeting degraders: (i) FibrilPaint1 binds fibrils with nanomolar affinity; (ii) it does also bind to oligomeric precursors, down to a size of only 4 layers; (iii) it does not bind to monomers (KD > 100 {micro}M); (iv) it is fluorescently labelled, which allows monitoring and localising interactions. (v) FibrilPaint1 recognises various Tau fibrils, including patient derived fibrils from Alzheimer, Corticobasal degeneration and Frontotemporal dementia; (vi) FibrilPaint1 is selective for the amyloid state and does not have background binding to amorphous aggregates, blood serum or cell lysate. In combination with Flow Induced Dispersion Analysis (FIDA), a microfluidics technology, we determined the molecular size of amyloid fibrils with sub-microliter sample volumes. This set-up acts as a molecular ruler at layer resolution - we determined Tau fibril length from 4 to 1100 layers in solution. This is an interesting parameter that can be used for diagnostic applications and biochemical research in dementia.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.