Back

Development of an MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) lesioning approach for small and deep structures in the rat brain

Cornelssen, C.; Payne, A.; Parker, D.; Alexander, M.; Merrill, R.; Senthilkumar, S.; Christensen, J.; Wilcox, K. S.; Odeen, H.; Rolston, J. D.

2023-10-16 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.10.11.561930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveHigh-intensity magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive therapy to lesion brain tissue, used clinically in patients and preclinically in several animal models. Challenges with focused ablation in rodent brains can include skull and near-field heating and accurately targeting small and deep brain structures. We overcame these challenges by creating a novel method consisting of a craniectomy skull preparation, a high-frequency transducer (3 MHz) with a small ultrasound focal spot, a transducer positioning system with an added manual adjustment of [~]0.1 mm targeting accuracy, and MR acoustic radiation force imaging for confirmation of focal spot placement. MethodsThe study consisted of two main parts. First, two skull preparation approaches were compared. A skull thinning approach (n=7 lesions) was compared to a craniectomy approach (n=22 lesions), which confirmed a craniectomy was necessary to decrease skull and near-field heating. Second, the two transducer positioning systems were compared with the fornix chosen as a subcortical ablation target. We evaluated the accuracy of targeting using a high-frequency transducer with a small ultrasound focal spot and MR acoustic radiation force imaging. ResultsComparing a motorized adjustment system ([~]1 mm precision, n=17 lesions) to the motorized system with an added micromanipulator ([~]0.1 mm precision, n=14 lesions), we saw an increase in the accuracy of targeting the fornix by 133%. The described work allows for repeatable and accurate targeting of small and deep structures in the rodent brain, such as the fornix, enabling the investigation of neurological disorders in chronic disease models.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.