Back

Non-coding variants impact cis-regulatory coordination in a cell type-specific manner

Pushkarev, O.; van Mierlo, G.; Kribelbauer, J. F.; Saelens, W.; Gardeux, V.; Deplancke, B.

2023-10-11 genomics
10.1101/2023.10.11.561870 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDInteractions among cis-regulatory elements (CREs) play a crucial role in gene regulation. Various approaches have been developed to map these interactions genome-wide, including those relying on interindividual epigenomic variation to identify groups of covariable regulatory elements, referred to as chromatin modules (CMs). While CM mapping allows to investigate the relationship between chromatin modularity and gene expression, the computational principles used for CM identification vary in their application and outcomes. RESULTSWe comprehensively evaluate and streamline existing CM mapping tools and present guidelines for optimal utilization of epigenome data from a diverse population of individuals to assess regulatory coordination across the human genome. We showcase the effectiveness of our recommended practices by analysing distinct cell types and demonstrate cell type-specificity of CRE interactions in CMs and their relevance for gene expression. Integration of genotype information revealed that many non-coding disease-associated variants affect the activity of CMs in a cell type-specific manner by affecting the binding of cell type-specific transcription factors. We provide example cases that illustrate in detail how CMs can be used to deconstruct GWAS loci, understand variable expression of cell surface receptors in immune cells and reveal how genetic variation can impact the expression of prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. CONCLUSIONSOur study presents an optimal strategy for CM mapping, and reveals how CMs capture the coordination of CREs and its impact on gene expression. Non-coding genetic variants can disrupt this coordination, and we highlight how this may lead to disease predisposition in a cell type-specific manner.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.