Back

Safety of SARS-CoV-2 test-to-stay in daycare: a regression discontinuity in time analysis

Dewald, F.; Steger, G.; Fish, I.; Torre-Lage, I.; Hellriegel, C.; Milz, E.; Kolb-Bastigkeit, A.; Heger, E.; Fries, M.; Buess, M.; Marizy, N.; Michaelis, B.; Suarez, I.; Quintanares, G. H. R.; Pirkl, M.; Aigner, A.; Obserste-Frielinghaus, M.; Hellmich, M.; Wong, A.; Camilo Orduz, J.; Faetkenheuer, G.; Doetsch, J.; Kossow, A.; Moench, E.-M.; Quade, G.; Neumann, U.; Kaiser, R.; Schranz, M.; Klein, F.

2023-10-12 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.10.11.23296808 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesTest-to-stay concepts apply serial testing of children in daycare after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 without use of quarantine. This study aims to assess safety of a test-to-stay screening in daycare facilities. Methods714 daycare facilities and approximately 50,000 children [≤]6 years in Cologne, Germany participated in a SARS-CoV-2 Pool-PCR screening from March 2021 to April 2022. The screening initially comprised post-exposure quarantine and was adapted to a test-to-stay approach during its course. To assess safety of the test-to-stay approach, we explored potential changes in frequencies of infections among children following the adaptation to the test-to-stay approach by applying regression discontinuity in time (RDiT) analyses. To this end, PCR-test data were linked with routinely collected data on reported infections in children and analyzed using ordinary least squares regressions. Results219,885 Pool-PCRs and 352,305 Single-PCRs were performed. 6,440 (2.93%) Pool-PCRs tested positive, and 17,208 infections in children were reported. We estimated that during a period of 30 weeks, the test-to-stay concept avoided between 7 and 20 days of quarantine per eligible daycare child. RDiT revealed a 26% reduction (Exp. Coef: 0.74, CI:0.52;1.06) in infection frequency among children and indicated no significant increase attributable to the test-to-stay approach. This result was not sensitive to adjustments for 7-day incidence, season, SARS-CoV-2 variant, and socioeconomic status. ConclusionOur analyses provide evidence that suggest safety of the test-to-stay approach compared to traditional quarantine measures. This approach offers a promising option to avoid use of quarantine after exposure to respiratory pathogens in daycare settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
11
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%