Back

The effect of protein levels of ABO on pregnancy related outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study

Sun, Y.; Zheng, H.; Wang, M.; Gu, R.; Wu, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhao, H.; Bi, Y.; Zheng, J.

2023-10-12 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.10.11.23296777 medRxiv
Show abstract

Protein level of Histo-Blood Group ABO System Transferase (ABO) has been reported to be associated with cardiometabolic diseases. But its effect on pregnancy related outcomes was still unclear. Here we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization study to ascertain the putative causal roles of protein levels of ABO in pregnancy related outcomes. Cis-acting protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) robustly associated with protein level of ABO (P < 5x10-8) were used as instruments to proxy the ABO level (N = 35,559, data from deCODE), with two additional pQTL datasets from Fenland (N = 10,708) and INTERVAL (N = 3,301) used as validation exposures. Ten pregnancy related diseases and complications were selected as outcomes. We observed that a higher protein level of ABO showed a putative causal effect on venous complications and haemorrhoids in pregnancy (OR = 1.207, 95%CI = 1.107-1.316, colocalization probability = 91.3%), which was validated by using pQTLs from Fenland and INTERVAL. The Mendelian randomization results further showed effects of the ABO protein on gestational hypertension (OR = 0.974, 95%CI = 0.953-0.995), despite insignificance after multiple testing correction and little colocalization evidence. Sensitivity analyses, including proteome-wide Mendelian randomization of the cis-acting ABO pQTLs, showed little evidence of horizontal pleiotropy. Correctively, our study prioritised ABO as a putative causal protein for venous complications and haemorrhoids in pregnancy. Future epidemiology and clinical studies are needed to investigate whether ABO can be considered as a drug target to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.