Back

Alkaline and loess grasslands with contrasting richness and biomass patterns are not separated on the CSR strategy spectrum.

McIntosh-Buday, A.; Sonkoly, J.; Molnar, A.; Szel-Toth, K.; Toro-Szijgyarto, V.; Madar, S.; Karolyi, E.; Diaz Cando, P. E.; Kovacsics-Vari, G.; Tothmeresz, B.; Torok, P.

2023-10-13 ecology
10.1101/2023.10.10.561704 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studying the relationship between biodiversity patterns and processes in vegetation has been at the centre of interest in vegetation ecology for several decades. By studying the biomass of loess and alkaline grasslands along a water and salinity gradient, we aimed to analyse species diversity and CSR functional type patterns. We aimed to test the following hypotheses: i) The biomass and species richness scores and the species composition are significantly different between the sampled grassland community types. ii) The sampled communities are well separated based on the CSR strategy spectrum. iii) The amount of green biomass and litter are positively correlated with competitiveness and negatively with stress tolerance. The biomass and species richness scores and the species composition of the sampled communities along the sampled gradients were significantly different; the highest species richness, evenness and Shannon diversity values were found in loess grasslands. The highest level of litter accumulation was found in alkaline meadows. The communities were well separated in the ordinations but surprisingly, calculation of coordinates for CSR strategy types have not shown clear separation of the grassland community types. Based on the results we can conclude that the current CSR classification is too robust to delineate grassland communities in alkaline landscapes which are markedly different in composition. We point out that the CSR classification is based on the magnitude of stress, and it is not able to differentiate between the various forms of stress which might be responsible for the marked compositional differences. Therefore, developing an index focusing specifically on the functional characterisation of stressed communities and able to differentiate between different forms of stress (e.g., water and/or salinity stress) would be highly beneficial for future studies.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.5%
3
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
9
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
13
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
19
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
23
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
27
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
28
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%