Back

Validation of an AI-based solution for breast cancer risk stratification using routine digital histopathology images

Sharma, A.; Lovgren, S. K.; Eriksson, K. L.; Wang, Y.; Robertson, S.; Hartman, J.; Rantalainen, M.

2024-01-16 pathology
10.1101/2023.10.10.23296761 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStratipath Breast is a CE-IVD marked artificial intelligence-based solution for prognostic risk stratification of breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups, using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathology whole slide images (WSIs). In this validation study, we assessed the prognostic performance of Stratipath Breast in two independent breast cancer cohorts. MethodsThis retrospective multi-site validation study included 2719 patients with primary breast cancer from two Swedish hospitals. The Stratipath Breast tool was applied to stratify patients based on digitised WSIs of the diagnostic H&E-stained tissue sections from surgically resected tumours. The prognostic performance was evaluated using time-to-event analysis by multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards analysis with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint. ResultsIn the clinically relevant oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patient subgroup, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) associated with PFS between low- and high-risk groups was 2.76 (95% CI: 1.63-4.66, p-value < 0.001) after adjusting for established risk factors. In the ER+/HER2-Nottingham histological grade (NHG) 2 subgroup, the HR was 2.20 (95% CI: 1.22-3.98, p-value = 0.009) between low- and high-risk groups. ConclusionThe results indicate an independent prognostic value of Stratipath Breast among all breast cancer patients, as well as in the clinically relevant ER+/HER2-subgroup and the NHG2/ER+/HER2-subgroup. Improved risk stratification of intermediate-risk ER+/HER2-breast cancers provides information relevant for treatment decisions of adjuvant chemotherapy and has the potential to reduce both under- and overtreatment. Image-based risk stratification provides the added benefit of short lead times and substantially lower cost compared to molecular diagnostics and therefore has the potential to reach broader patient groups.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
5
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
11
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
13
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%