Back

The developmental trajectory of 1H-MRS brain metabolites from childhood to adulthood.

Thomson, A.; Hwa, H.; Pasanta, D.; Hopwood, B.; Powell, H.; Lawrence, R.; Gracia-Tabuenca, Z.; Arichi, T.; Edden, R.; Chai, X. J.; Puts, N.

2023-10-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.10.05.560892 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human brain development is ongoing throughout childhood, with for example myelination of nerve fibres and refinement of synaptic connections continuing until early adulthood. 1H-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-MRS) can be used to quantify the concentrations of endogenous metabolites (e.g., glutamate and {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA)) in the human brain in vivo and so can provide valuable, tractable insight into the biochemical processes that support postnatal neurodevelopment. This can feasibly provide new insight into and aid management of neurodevelopmental disorders by providing chemical markers of atypical development. This study aims to characterize the normative developmental trajectory of various brain metabolites, as measured by 1H-MRS from a midline posterior parietal voxel. We find significant non-linear trajectories for GABA+, Glx, tNAA and tCr concentrations. Glx and GABA+ concentrations steeply decrease across childhood. tNAA concentrations are relatively stable in childhood but gradually decrease from early adulthood, while tCr concentrations increase from childhood to early adulthood. tCho was the only metabolite to have a strictly linear association with age. Trajectories likely reflect fundamental neurodevelopmental processes (including local circuit refinement) which occur from childhood to early adulthood and can be associated with cognitive development; we find GABA+ concentrations significantly positively correlate with recognition memory scores across post-natal development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.