Back

Differential processing of delay versus uncertainty in male but not female 16p11.2 hemideletion mice

Rojas, G. R.; Heller, A. T.; Grissom, N. M.

2023-10-06 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2023.10.04.560951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders are associated with differences in learning and motivation that can influence executive function, including behavioral flexibility and decision making. 16p11.2 hemideletion is a chromosomal copy number variant that is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders. 16p11.2 hemideletion in mice has been previously found to produce male-biased changes in reward learning, but the link between this and altered flexible decision making is poorly understood. We challenged 16p11.2 hemideletion mice with two reward-guided decision making tasks assessing flexible decision making under cost, delay and probability discounting. Both tasks elicited long-term changes in flexible decision making that separated 16p11.2 hemideletion males from wildtype males. In delay discounting,16p11.2 hemideletion males had a stronger, less flexible preference for the large reward at long delays, and this effect was reduced as wildtype males adjusted their preference to match that of the hemideletion males. In probability discounting, 16p11.2 hemideletion males initially had a similar preference for seeking improbable large rewards as did wildtype males, but over time began to prefer certainty to a greater extent than did wildtype males. Female mice discounted similarly for delayed or risky rewards regardless of the presence of the copy number variant. We have previously seen that male 16p11.2 hemideletion mice commit fewer nonreinforced responses than male wildtype mice in an operant setting, which we replicate here in delay discounting, while the introduction of risky rewards eliminates genotype differences in nonreinforced responses. Overall these data suggest that 16p11.2 hemideletion in males leads to differential processing of costs of delay versus inconsistency, with greater aversion to uncertainty than delays, and greater behavioral control by cues that consistently predict an outcome.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
12.1%
2
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
4
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
11
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
15
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
Molecular Autism
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
20
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
28
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%