Back

Effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN vaccine against mpox infection in males in Ontario, Canada: A target trial emulation

Navarro, C.; Lau, C.; Buchan, S. A.; Burchell, A.; Nasreen, S.; Friedman, L.; Okpokoro, E.; Austin, P.; Tan, D.; Gubbay, J.; Kwong, J. C.; Mishra, S.

2023-10-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.10.04.23296566 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLimited evidence is available on the real-world effectiveness of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic vaccine (MVA-BN) against mpox infection. MethodsWe emulated a target trial using linked databases in Ontario, Canada to estimate the effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN. Our study included males aged [≥]18 years who: (1) had a history of syphilis testing and a laboratory-confirmed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the prior year; or (2) filled a prescription for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the prior year. On each day between June 12, 2022 and October 27, 2022, males who had been vaccinated 15 days prior were matched 1:1 with unvaccinated males by age, geographic region, prior HIV diagnosis, number of bacterial STI diagnoses in the previous three years, and receipt of any non- MVA-BN vaccine in the previous year. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the hazard ratio comparing the incidence of mpox between the two groups, and calculated vaccine effectiveness as (1-HR)x100. ResultsEach group included 3,204 males. A total of 71 mpox infections were diagnosed over the study period, with 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.13) per 1000 person-days for the vaccinated group and 0.20 (95%CI, 0.15-0.27) per 1000 person-days for the unvaccinated group. Estimated vaccine effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN against mpox infection was 59% (95%CI, 31-76%). ConclusionsThis study, conducted in the context of a targeted vaccination program and evolving outbreak, suggests that one dose of MVA-BN is moderately effective in preventing mpox infection.

Published in BMJ (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.