Spatial transcriptomics of peach and nectarine elucidates the mechanism underlying fruit trichome development
Zhao, Z.; Cao, K.; Qin, A.; Liu, Z.; Guan, L.; Sun, S.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y.; Hu, M.; Ninkuu, V.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.
Show abstract
Peach (Prunus persica) is an economically significant fruit-bearing tree. The trichomes of peach fruits are essential for their growth and development by playing a protective role against abiotic stresses, such as intense ultraviolet (UV) light, high temperature, cold-induced stress, and biotic stresses, such as pests and disease infestation. However, the mechanism underlying trichome development in peach fruits is unknown. Therefore, spatial transcriptome sequencing technology was used to compare the transcriptomic information seven days after flowering (DAF) of peach and nectarine fruits at an ultra-high resolution. The results revealed significant variations in how fruits at the early development stage responded to stress exposure. Comparatively, nectarine response to stress was significantly magnified than peach. Notably, a novel trichome-related marker gene, Prupe.7G196500, was identified in peach, which showed a robust function in response to jasmonic acid and wounding. Further, the Prupe.7G196500pro::GUS construct was found to specifically expressed in the trichomes of the true leaves of 10-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) seedlings and induced by drought treatment. Finally, gain-of-function analysis showed that Prupe.7G196500 promoted trichomes development. In conclusion, this study identified the cell types and novel marker genes associated with peach fruit. The role of Prupe.7G196500 in positively regulating trichome development was also characterized, thereby laying the foundation for analyzing the mechanism involved in trichome development in peach fruits.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Histone H3K4 methyltransferase DcATX1 promotes ethylene induced petal senescence in carnation 97%
- ESD1 Affects Seed Setting Rate in Rice by Controlling Embryo Sac Development 97%
- Natural variation in GmRAV confers ecological adaptation through photoperiod control of flowering time and maturity in soybean 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ancestral duplicated DL/CRC orthologs display function on orchid reproductive organ innovation 97%
- The APETALA2 transcription factor LsAP2 regulates seed shape in lettuce 97%
- Three-dimensional fruit growth analysis clarifies developmental mechanisms underlying complex shape diversity in persimmon fruit 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide analysis of the apple family 1 glycosyltransferases identified a flavonoid-modifying UGT, MdUGT83L3, which is targeted by MdMYB88 and contributes to stress adaptation 97%
- Yellow-Fruited Phenotype is Caused by an Insertion Event at 5' UTR of YFT1 Allele in yft1 Mutant Tomato 96%
- Mixed DAMP/MAMP oligosaccharides promote both growth and defense against fungal pathogens of cucumber 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- miRNA858b Inhibits Proanthocyanidin Accumulation by Repression of DkMYB19 and DkMYB20 in Persimmon 98%
- Systematic analysis of the R2R3-MYB family of transcription factors in Camellia sinensis: evidence for species-specific catechin biosynthesis regulation 97%
- Postharvest properties of ultra-late maturing peach cultivars and their attributions to Melting Flesh (M) locus: Re-evaluation of M locus in association with flesh texture 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Root-specific secondary metabolism at the single-cell level: a case study of theanine metabolism and regulation in the roots of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) 95%
- ATG6 interacting with NPR1 increases Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to Pst DC3000/avrRps4 by increasing its nuclear accumulation and stability 94%
- An increase of NPY1 expression leads to inhibitory phosphorylation of PIN-FORMED (PIN) proteins and suppression of pinoid (pid) null mutants 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.