Back

Shared genetic basis informs the roles of polyunsaturated fatty acids in brain disorders

Xu, H.; Sun, Y.; Francis, M.; Cheng, C. F.; Modulla, N. T. R.; Brenna, J. T.; Chiang, C. W. K.; Ye, K.

2023-10-04 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.10.03.23296500 medRxiv
Show abstract

The neural tissue is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), components that are indispensable for the proper functioning of neurons, such as neurotransmission. PUFA nutritional deficiency and imbalance have been linked to a variety of chronic brain disorders, including major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, and anorexia. However, the effects of PUFAs on brain disorders remain inconclusive, and the extent of their shared genetic determinants is largely unknown. Here, we used genome-wide association summary statistics to systematically examine the shared genetic basis between six phenotypes of circulating PUFAs (N = 114,999) and 20 brain disorders (N = 9,725-762,917), infer their potential causal relationships, identify colocalized regions, and pinpoint shared genetic variants. Genetic correlation and polygenic overlap analyses revealed a widespread shared genetic basis for 77 trait pairs between six PUFA phenotypes and 16 brain disorders. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis indicated potential causal relationships for 16 pairs of PUFAs and brain disorders, including alcohol consumption, bipolar disorder (BIP), and MDD. Colocalization analysis identified 40 shared loci (13 unique) among six PUFAs and ten brain disorders. Twenty-two unique variants were statistically inferred as candidate shared causal variants, including rs1260326 (GCKR), rs174564 (FADS2) and rs4818766 (ADARB1). These findings reveal a widespread shared genetic basis between PUFAs and brain disorders, pinpoint specific shared variants, and provide support for the potential effects of PUFAs on certain brain disorders, especially MDD, BIP, and alcohol consumption.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.