Network state dynamics underpin craving in a transdiagnostic population
Ye, J.; Garrison, K. A.; Lacadie, C.; Potenza, M. N.; Sinha, R.; Goldfarb, E. V.; Scheinost, D.
Show abstract
Emerging fMRI brain dynamic methods present a unique opportunity to capture how brain region interactions across time give rise to evolving affective and motivational states. As the unfolding experience and regulation of affective states affect psychopathology and well-being, it is important to elucidate their underlying time-varying brain responses. Here, we developed a novel framework to identify network states specific to an affective state of interest and examine how their instantaneous engagement contributed to its experience. This framework investigated network state dynamics underlying craving, a clinically meaningful and changeable state. In a transdiagnostic sample of healthy controls and individuals diagnosed with or at risk for craving-related disorders (N=252), we utilized connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to identify craving-predictive edges. An edge-centric timeseries approach was leveraged to quantify the instantaneous engagement of the craving-positive and craving-negative networks during independent scan runs. Individuals with higher craving persisted longer in a craving-positive network state while dwelling less in a craving-negative network state. We replicated the latter results externally in an independent group of healthy controls and individuals with alcohol use disorder exposed to different stimuli during the scan (N=173). The associations between craving and network state dynamics can still be consistently observed even when craving-predictive edges were instead identified in the replication dataset. These robust findings suggest that variations in craving-specific network state recruitment underpin individual differences in craving. Our framework additionally presents a new avenue to explore how the moment-to-moment engagement of behaviorally meaningful network states supports our changing affective experiences.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dysfunctional cortical gradient topography in treatment resistant major depression 95%
- Manifold learning uncovers nonlinear interactions between the adolescent brain and environment that predict emotional and behavioral problems 95%
- Default Mode Network Hypoalignment of Function to Structure Correlates with Depression and Rumination 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Glutamate and Dysconnection in the Salience Network: Neurochemical, Effective-connectivity, and Computational Evidence in Schizophrenia 94%
- Effective connectivity of LSD-induced ego dissolution 93%
- Dimensional and Categorical Solutions to Parsing Depression Heterogeneity in a Large Single-Site Sample 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- State and trait characteristics of anterior insula time-varying functional connectivity 96%
- Serotonergic psychedelic drugs LSD and psilocybin reduce the hierarchical differentiation of unimodal and transmodal cortex 95%
- Dynamic functional brain networks underlying the temporal inertia of negative emotions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tensorial Independent Component Analysis Reveals Social and Reward Networks Associated with Major Depressive Disorder 95%
- Understanding the link between functional profiles and intelligence through dimensionality reduction and graph analysis 94%
- Structural architecture and brain network efficiency links polygenic scores to intelligence 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.