Predicting individualized treatment effects of corticosteroids in community-acquired-pneumonia: a data-driven analysis of randomized controlled trials
Smit, J. M.; van der Zee, P. A.; Stoof, S. C. M.; van Genderen, M. E.; Snijders, D.; Boersma, W. G.; Confalonieri, P.; Salton, F.; Confalonieri, M.; Shih, M.-C.; Meduri, G. U.; Dequin, P.-F.; Le Gouge, A.; Lloyd, M.; Karunajeewa, H.; Bartminski, G.; Fernandez-Serrano, S.; Suarez-Cuartin, G.; van Klaveren, D.; Briel, M.; Schoenenberger, C. M.; Steyerberg, E. W.; Gommers, D. A. M. P. J.; Bax, H. I.; Bos, W. J. W.; van de Garde, E.; Wittermans, E.; Grutters, J. C.; Blum, C. A.; Christ-Crain, M.; Torres, A.; Motos, A.; Reinders, M. J. T.; van Bommel, J.; Krijthe, J. H.; Endeman, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundCorticosteroids could improve outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, we hypothesize that corticosteroid effectiveness varies among individual patients, resulting in inconsistent outcomes and unclear clinical indication. Therefore, we developed and validated a predictive, causal model based on baseline characteristics to predict individualized treatment effects (ITEs) of corticosteroids on mortality in patients with CAP. MethodsWe obtained individual patient data from six randomized controlled trials comparing corticosteroid therapy to placebo in 1,869 adult CAP patients. The study endpoint was 30-day mortality. We performed effect modelling through logistic regression and evaluated the predicted ITEs in terms of discrimination and calibration for benefit. Our modelling procedure involved variable selection, missing value imputation, data normalization, encoding treatment variables, creating interaction terms, optimizing penalization strength, and training logistic regression models. We evaluated discriminative performance using the newly proposed AUC-benefit. FindingsThe model identified high levels of CRP and glucose, at baseline, as main predictors for benefit of corticosteroid treatment. Using a decision threshold of ITE=0, the model predicted harm in 1,004 patient and benefit in 864 patients. We observed benefit in patients where the model predicted benefit, with an odds ratio of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9) and a mortality reduction of 3.2% (95% CI: 0.7 to 5.6), and no statistically significant benefit in the patients where the model predicted harm, with an odds ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.8) and a negative mortality reduction (hence, increase) of -0.3% (95% CI: -2.6 to 1.8). The model yielded an AUC-benefit of 184.9 (28.6 to 347.6, 95% CI), underestimated ITEs in the lower ITE region and slightly overestimated ITEs in the higher ITE region. InterpretationOur model has potential to identify patients with CAP who benefit from corticosteroid treatment, and aid in the design of personalized clinical trials. We will prospectively validate the model in two recent CAP trials.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Federated Target Trial Emulation using Distributed Observational Data for Treatment Effect Estimation 96%
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 93%
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trial Risk Assessment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Standardized Metric to Enhance Clinical Trial Design and Outcome Interpretation in Type 1 Diabetes 94%
- Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19: an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials 93%
- Integration of clinical characteristics, lab tests and a deep learning CT scan analysis to predict severity of hospitalized COVID-19 patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 93%
- Personalized survival probabilities for SARS-CoV-2 positive patients by explainable machine learning 93%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning guided association of adverse drug reactions with in vitro target-based pharmacology 92%
- Transformer-based deep learning model for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer in primary care based on electronic health record data 91%
- Integrative deep learning analysis improves colon adenocarcinoma patient stratification at risk for mortality 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.