Break-induced replication underlies formation of inverted triplications and generates unexpected diversity in haplotype structures
Grochowski, C. M.; Bengtsson, J. D.; Du, H.; Gandhi, M.; Lun, M. Y.; Mehaffey, M. G.; Park, K.; Hoeps, W.; Benito-Garagorri, E.; Hasenfeld, P.; Korbel, J. O.; Mahmoud, M.; Paulin, L. F.; Jhangiani, S. N.; Muzny, D. M.; Faith, J. M.; Gibbs, R. A.; Pendleton, M.; Harrington, E.; Juul, S.; Lindstrand, A.; Sedlazeck, F. J.; Pehlivan, D.; Lupski, J. R.; Carvalho, C. M. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe duplication-triplication/inverted-duplication (DUP-TRP/INV-DUP) structure is a type of complex genomic rearrangement (CGR) hypothesized to result from replicative repair of DNA due to replication fork collapse. It is often mediated by a pair of inverted low-copy repeats (LCR) followed by iterative template switches resulting in at least two breakpoint junctions in cis. Although it has been identified as an important mutation signature of pathogenicity for genomic disorders and cancer genomes, its architecture remains unresolved and is predicted to display at least four structural variation (SV) haplotypes. ResultsHere we studied the genomic architecture of DUP-TRP/INV-DUP by investigating the genomic DNA of 24 patients with neurodevelopmental disorders identified by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on whom we found evidence for the existence of 4 out of 4 predicted SV haplotypes. Using a combination of short-read genome sequencing (GS), long- read GS, optical genome mapping and StrandSeq the haplotype structure was resolved in 18 samples. This approach refined the point of template switching between inverted LCRs in 4 samples revealing a DNA segment of [~]2.2-5.5 kb of 100% nucleotide similarity. A prediction model was developed to infer the LCR used to mediate the non-allelic homology repair. ConclusionsThese data provide experimental evidence supporting the hypothesis that inverted LCRs act as a recombinant substrate in replication-based repair mechanisms. Such inverted repeats are particularly relevant for formation of copy-number associated inversions, including the DUP-TRP/INV-DUP structures. Moreover, this type of CGR can result in multiple conformers which contributes to generate diverse SV haplotypes in susceptible loci.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-modal investigation of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 genomic interval reveals global genetic diversity with unique haplotypes and segments that increase the risk for non-allelic homologous recombination 95%
- T Cell Receptor Beta Germline Variability is Revealed by Inference From Repertoire Data 95%
- Nanopore sequencing with unique molecular identifiers enables accurate mutation analysis and haplotyping in the complex Lipoprotein(a) KIV-2 VNTR 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Copy number normalization distinguishes differential signals driven by copy number differences in ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq 96%
- Towards a better understanding of the low recall of insertion variants with short-read based variant callers 93%
- Characterization of a strain-specific CD-1 reference genome reveals potential inter- and intra-strain functional variability 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased ultra-rare variant load in an isolated Scottish population impacts exonic and regulatory regions 94%
- Genomic features underlie the co-option of SVA transposons as cis-regulatory elements in human pluripotent stem cells 94%
- Missense variants causing Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome preferentially occur in the KMT2A-CXXC domain and are accurately classified using AlphaFold2 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-read whole-genome sequencing-based concurrent haplotyping and aneuploidy profiling of single cells 94%
- Enhanced Detection and Genotyping of Disease-Associated Tandem Repeats Using HMMSTR and Targeted Long-Read Sequencing 94%
- Genome-wide characterization of human minisatellite VNTRs: population-specific alleles and gene expression differences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.