Eccentricity strongly modulates visual processing delays
Burge, J.; Dyer, C. M.
Show abstract
The temporal dynamics of visual information processing varies with the stimulus being processed and with the retinal location that initiates the processing. Here, we present psychophysical data with sub-millisecond precision showing that increasing eccentricity decreases the delay with which stimuli are processed. We show that, even within the central +/-6{o} of the visual field, processing delays change by a factor of up to three times. A simple model, grounded in retinal physiology, provides a good account of the data. The relative delays are on the order of only milliseconds. But if later processing leaves the delays unresolved, they can cause dramatic misperceptions of motion and 3D layout. We discuss the implications for how the human visual system solves the temporal binding problem across eccentricity. The results highlight the severe computational challenge of obtaining accurate, temporally-unified percepts of the environment with spatiotemporally-staggered processing across the visual field.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple decisions about one object involve parallel sensory acquisition but time-multiplexed evidence incorporation 96%
- Predictably manipulating photoreceptor light responses to reveal their role in downstream visual responses 96%
- Neural Correlates of Perceptual Similarity Masking in Primate V1 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics 97%
- How the window of visibility varies around polar angle 96%
- A computational observer model of spatial contrast sensitivity: Effects of photocurrent encoding, fixational eye movements and inference engine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.