Back

Resident memory T cell development is associated with AP-1 transcription factor upregulation across anatomical niches.

Smith, N. P.; Yan, Y.; Pan, Y.; Williams, J. B.; Manakongtreecheep, K.; Pant, S.; Zhao, J.; Tian, T.; Pan, T.; Stingley, C.; Wu, K.; Zhang, J.; Kley, A. L.; Sorger, P. K.; Villani, A.-C.; Kupper, T. S.

2023-10-02 immunology
10.1101/2023.09.29.560006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells play a central role in immune responses to pathogens across all barrier tissues after infection. However, the underlying mechanisms that drive TRM differentiation and priming for their recall effector function remains unclear. In this study, we leveraged both newly generated and publicly available single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) data generated across 10 developmental time points to define features of CD8 TRM across both skin and small-intestine intraepithelial lymphocytes (siIEL). We employed linear modeling to capture temporally-associated gene programs that increase their expression levels in T cell subsets transitioning from an effector to a memory T cell state. In addition to capturing tissue-specific gene programs, we defined a consensus TRM signature of 60 genes across skin and siIEL that can effectively distinguish TRM from circulating T cell populations, providing a more specific TRM signature than what was previously generated by comparing bulk TRM to naive or non-tissue resident memory populations. This updated TRM signature included the AP-1 transcription factor family members Fos, Fosb and Fosl2. Moreover, ATACseq analysis detected an enrichment of AP-1-specific motifs at open chromatin sites in mature TRM. CyCIF tissue imaging detected nuclear co-localization of AP-1 members Fosb and Junb in resting CD8 TRM >100 days post-infection. Taken together, these results reveal a critical role of AP-1 transcription factor members in TRM biology and suggests a novel mechanism for rapid reactivation of resting TRM in tissue upon antigen encounter.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.